Leave it as is
No time or budget spent right away
Security and stability risk keeps growing silently
The next incident lands with no warning

Lovable, Bolt, Cursor or Claude Code got your product out fast. We audit it, fix what is fragile, and turn it into software your team can build on.
You'll be talking with Rahim Gharbi
Lovable, Bolt, Cursor or an AI agent deliver a prototype in days. The hidden cost: no tests, inconsistent patterns, an architecture nobody really chose.
A founder validated an idea with Lovable or Cursor and now needs it to hold up with real users. An AI-built internal tool handles sensitive data.

Vibe coded doesn't mean worthless.
Code written fast with AI isn't necessarily bad; it's untested. We sort out what's solid, what's fragile and what's broken.
Three paths, three levels of risk. Leaving it as is holds until the next incident. Patching it yourself treats symptoms, not the cause.
No time or budget spent right away
Security and stability risk keeps growing silently
The next incident lands with no warning
Fast to start, no external help needed
Usually fixes symptoms, not the root cause
Technical debt keeps compounding underneath
A clear, evidenced picture of what's fragile
Fixes prioritized by real risk, not guesswork
A codebase your team can safely keep building on
What we built for a client facing the same challenge.

Understand before touching, secure what's fragile, then improve on solid ground.
Read the code, architecture, and dependencies to see what's there.
Check authentication, access control, exposed secrets, injections and data handling for real exposure.
Protect the areas that would hurt the most if they broke.
Fix what's fragile, leave working code alone.
Remove the sources of recurring incidents and set up monitoring, so the next problem is caught before your users find it.
Leave you with a codebase your team can maintain.

The code and data are yours, before, during and after. You get a transparent audit report: what we found, and why.
Yes, that's most of this service. We always start with an audit, to understand decisions before questioning them.
Rarely. We decide section by section what to keep, refactor or rebuild, based on how fragile it is. A full rewrite is a last resort.
That's the norm with AI-generated code. We document as we audit and refactor, so your team doesn't depend on us.
Yes. We work in small changes, tested and deployed one at a time, without freezing the product.
Yes, in every audit: authentication, access, exposed secrets, injections. AI-generated code optimizes for working, rarely for security.
Through the audit: reading the code, mapping the architecture, spotting risk areas, then costing area by area. You leave with a prioritized plan.
A clear report: what's urgent, what can wait, and what each fix costs. You choose how far to go; nothing starts without your approval.
Yes, often. Once the code is stable, we can stay on as your tech team, already knowing the product inside out.
You tell us where you stand, we ask the right questions. It's free.
Options, a ballpark estimate and the points to watch out for, without jargon.
Move forward with us, on your own or with someone else: no strings attached.
A clear plan or just a hunch: in 30 minutes, you leave with concrete next steps and a first ballpark estimate.